Prior to being a personal trainer Carlsbad, in the spring of 1991 I was finishing my freshman year of studying engineering at the University of Washington in Seattle. One early morning my physics instructor had a problem dealing with the First Law of Thermodynamics (also called the conservation of energy). I did not understand it at the time, but that early morning would help figure my realization many years later that low-intensity "aerobic" activities are "exercises in futility."
My professor showed how to measure how many vertical feet you would need to climb as a way to lose the number of calories in a McDonald's meal of a Big Mac, fries, and smoothie. Calories in food are a measure of chemical energy, and that chemical energy could be transformed into other forms like the kinetic energy of moving your body or heat energy that warms you. Take that meal from McDonald's. I just looked at their internet site, and it determines that between the Big Mac, fried potatoes, and huge drink, that snack currently contains a total of 2,150 calories. My teacher presumed a 25% performance of the human body transforming the food calories into useable force (the other 75% will be dissipated as wasted heat), and assessed how significant those calories would raise somebody upward if 25% were changed into the potential force of raising a mass against the power of gravity.
Brushing up on my standard physics equations so as to publish this short article, I re-did the same calculations my instructor applied and calculated that a 150 lb . person consuming the above McDonald's meal has to climb 11,054 feet upward to melt away the 2,150 calories from that one snack. That doesn't indicate you would remove it by jogging 11,054 feet. You would have to climb a mountain or a staircase that's 11,054 feet high (or 2.09 miles high)! That's over 3 quarters of the way up Mt. Whitney (that is the tallest mountain in the continental US) as a way to melt the calories from that one snack. The point of that story is not to climb a mountain whenever you consume food, but alternatively to prove that calories burnt from more physical activity isn't substantial as opposed to calories that can be obtained in meals.
Due to this fact, many "aerobics" workout programs haven't shown a lot of effectiveness for aiding individuals to lose fat. The perfect fat burning results I've seen published are in the numbers of weight loss books by Ellington Darden, Ph.D. Darden applies a method for losing fat which concentrates on right eating plan and slow-motion high-intensity weight training. And, his weight loss groups do little, if any, "aerobic" activity. In all the years I have paid attention to fitness, I have not seen greater results documented elsewhere, and he has the standardized before and after pictures of his subjects throughout his books to confirm the efficiency of his method.
If "aerobic" training resulted in a major contribution when it comes to losing weight, I'd hope to view evidence for it everywhere, because for decades that's what the majority of the physical fitness industry has advocated for losing weight. You'd expect to find out a huge number of standardized before and after pictures of people performing primarily aerobics activities for losing fat and being successful at it, just like Darden's before and after pictures from his weight training based programs. But I haven't seen good examples of photographs like this from people involved in just an "aerobics" method. In fact, as review for an exercise book written in the 90's, Edward Jackowski, Ph.D., interviewed over 1,000 women who were longtime enthusiastic participants of aerobics dance programs, and one question he asked was "How many females, including yourself, do you know who have ever enormously improved their body by taking aerobics sessions?" Amazingly, all of the women had the same answer: "Zero."
In any event, a great moral to take away from my science teacher's computation is that changing eating methods can potentially have the single greatest result for weight loss out of any action a person can consider. In my own encounter of losing fifty lbs of fat and staying lean for going on 18 years, I could tell you that diet has contributed to my achievement with weight loss and maintenance more than anything else. I used to jog, step on the Stairmaster, and complete other low-intensity "aerobic" activities because I figured they were necessary to obtain and stay slim. I currently consider those to have been among the (many) faults that I've made in physical fitness. When I completely cut out running and other low-intensity "aerobic" activities from my workout routine, I did not get any heavier or any slimmer, and I did not get any stronger or any weaker. The only real change in my body was that my knees began feeling greater.
As a personal trainer Carlsbad, if you enjoy jogging or other low-intensity physical activities - more power to you. And successful resistance training could make you feel greater at those activities and perhaps make them more exciting for you too. Then again, I wouldn't rely on them to help you lose fat. To burn body fat, diet program is most influential. And then strength training will help by shaping and firming your body, forces "discriminated weight loss" (weight loss, not muscle loss), and retains your metabolism as high as possible during and after the losing fat process. Trying to do added low-intensity "aerobic" activities won't remove a sizeable amount of calories, and won't perform much for the fat reduction process as an effect. So even for fat burning, 20 minutes, two times a week of high-intensity weight training is all the exercise you need.
My professor showed how to measure how many vertical feet you would need to climb as a way to lose the number of calories in a McDonald's meal of a Big Mac, fries, and smoothie. Calories in food are a measure of chemical energy, and that chemical energy could be transformed into other forms like the kinetic energy of moving your body or heat energy that warms you. Take that meal from McDonald's. I just looked at their internet site, and it determines that between the Big Mac, fried potatoes, and huge drink, that snack currently contains a total of 2,150 calories. My teacher presumed a 25% performance of the human body transforming the food calories into useable force (the other 75% will be dissipated as wasted heat), and assessed how significant those calories would raise somebody upward if 25% were changed into the potential force of raising a mass against the power of gravity.
Brushing up on my standard physics equations so as to publish this short article, I re-did the same calculations my instructor applied and calculated that a 150 lb . person consuming the above McDonald's meal has to climb 11,054 feet upward to melt away the 2,150 calories from that one snack. That doesn't indicate you would remove it by jogging 11,054 feet. You would have to climb a mountain or a staircase that's 11,054 feet high (or 2.09 miles high)! That's over 3 quarters of the way up Mt. Whitney (that is the tallest mountain in the continental US) as a way to melt the calories from that one snack. The point of that story is not to climb a mountain whenever you consume food, but alternatively to prove that calories burnt from more physical activity isn't substantial as opposed to calories that can be obtained in meals.
Due to this fact, many "aerobics" workout programs haven't shown a lot of effectiveness for aiding individuals to lose fat. The perfect fat burning results I've seen published are in the numbers of weight loss books by Ellington Darden, Ph.D. Darden applies a method for losing fat which concentrates on right eating plan and slow-motion high-intensity weight training. And, his weight loss groups do little, if any, "aerobic" activity. In all the years I have paid attention to fitness, I have not seen greater results documented elsewhere, and he has the standardized before and after pictures of his subjects throughout his books to confirm the efficiency of his method.
If "aerobic" training resulted in a major contribution when it comes to losing weight, I'd hope to view evidence for it everywhere, because for decades that's what the majority of the physical fitness industry has advocated for losing weight. You'd expect to find out a huge number of standardized before and after pictures of people performing primarily aerobics activities for losing fat and being successful at it, just like Darden's before and after pictures from his weight training based programs. But I haven't seen good examples of photographs like this from people involved in just an "aerobics" method. In fact, as review for an exercise book written in the 90's, Edward Jackowski, Ph.D., interviewed over 1,000 women who were longtime enthusiastic participants of aerobics dance programs, and one question he asked was "How many females, including yourself, do you know who have ever enormously improved their body by taking aerobics sessions?" Amazingly, all of the women had the same answer: "Zero."
In any event, a great moral to take away from my science teacher's computation is that changing eating methods can potentially have the single greatest result for weight loss out of any action a person can consider. In my own encounter of losing fifty lbs of fat and staying lean for going on 18 years, I could tell you that diet has contributed to my achievement with weight loss and maintenance more than anything else. I used to jog, step on the Stairmaster, and complete other low-intensity "aerobic" activities because I figured they were necessary to obtain and stay slim. I currently consider those to have been among the (many) faults that I've made in physical fitness. When I completely cut out running and other low-intensity "aerobic" activities from my workout routine, I did not get any heavier or any slimmer, and I did not get any stronger or any weaker. The only real change in my body was that my knees began feeling greater.
As a personal trainer Carlsbad, if you enjoy jogging or other low-intensity physical activities - more power to you. And successful resistance training could make you feel greater at those activities and perhaps make them more exciting for you too. Then again, I wouldn't rely on them to help you lose fat. To burn body fat, diet program is most influential. And then strength training will help by shaping and firming your body, forces "discriminated weight loss" (weight loss, not muscle loss), and retains your metabolism as high as possible during and after the losing fat process. Trying to do added low-intensity "aerobic" activities won't remove a sizeable amount of calories, and won't perform much for the fat reduction process as an effect. So even for fat burning, 20 minutes, two times a week of high-intensity weight training is all the exercise you need.
About the Author:
Getting in sound condition with the help of personal trainer in Carlsbad not simply enhances your physique but also your health also. The benefits that you can obtain from Carlsbad personal trainer are endless.
No comments:
Post a Comment